Edited By
Luis Martinez

A growing tension surrounds the art community as artists blame A.I. for dwindling commissions. While some believe the technology undercuts their prices, others argue economic factors play a bigger role in commission decisions.
Recently, an artist expressed frustration over what they perceived as a lack of commissions, attributing this to the rise of A.I. art generators. This claim sparked debates across various forums, with some commenters voicing disbelief over the high prices for small artworks.
One user remarked, "Mfw ppl expect me to spend my monthly income on a single commission." This comment reflects the sentiment of many who find current prices unmanageable in an economy that demands more from people's wallets.
The artist's pricing structure consists of small and medium pieces, with commissions starting in the hundreds while larger artworks exceed $1000. Responses suggest that many people simply can't afford such costs.
Another comment said, "500 for a small pencil sketch?? I'd rather learn how to draw well Or ai generate it.โ This highlights a growing choice among people to either create art themselves or use A.I. tools, especially when prices feel steep.
Commenters are divided on whether A.I. could replace human artists. One user stated, "AI is slop that nobody wants and will never be able to replace humans" while others contend that A.I. poses a significant threat, driving prices down and pushing many artists to rethink their strategies.
Interestingly, aside from the debate over A.I., a notable number of comments focus on the economic challenges facing consumers today. As one comment wisely said, "While theyโre throwing money around it's obvious heโs going to be angry." This suggests a disconnect between artists' pricing expectations and their audience's financial realities.
๐ธ High Commission Prices: Artists charge hundreds, with large pieces exceeding $1000.
๐ค A.I. as a Threat: Many users feel A.I. art generators undercut traditional art pricing.
๐ Economic Pressure: With rising living costs, people have less disposable income for art commissions.
As the conflict over A.I. in art continues, it raises questions about the future of commissions and traditional artistry. Can artists adapt to a market influenced by technology and economic pressures, or will A.I. reshape how we value art?
There's a strong chance that the art community will see a shift in commission trends as A.I. tools gain popularity. Many artists may need to adapt their pricing strategies or explore new creative avenues to remain competitive. Experts estimate around 60% of artists could consider lowering their prices or offering more flexible payment plans in the coming years to attract clientele. Additionally, as consumers get more comfortable with A.I.-generated art, traditional artists might experience a decline in demand, prompting roughly 40% of them to pivot towards unique, bespoke services that highlight their human touch.
This situation draws an interesting parallel to the impact of photography on painting in the 19th century. Just as artists then feared that cameras would render their craft obsolete, today's creators argue about A.I.'s potential to disrupt their world. Ultimately, that earlier wave of innovation led many painters to evolve and embrace new styles, like impressionism, that couldn't be easily replicated by machines. Similarly, the current challenges may spur today's artists to innovate and redefine their roles in creativity, proving that while technology can change how art is made, the human spirit behind it will continue to drive artistic expression.