Home
/
Community engagement
/
Forums
/

Do people using ai consider themselves artists?

Are AI Users Reclaiming the Title of Artist? | A Deep Dive into the Debate

By

James Mwangi

Jan 8, 2026, 12:23 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A person sitting at a computer creating art using artificial intelligence software, surrounded by colorful digital artwork on the screen.
popular

A heated discussion is unfolding among creatives around the role of AI in art. Many users are weighing in on whether those who utilize AI tools can still consider themselves artists, sparking a debate that reveals diverse opinions and experiences.

The Heart of the Matter

The conversation has gained momentum since AI began transforming artistic processes. Comments reflect a wide range of experiences and perspectives, suggesting a significant emotional investment in the subject.

Varied Perspectives on Artistic Identity

  1. True Artistic Spirit: Some argue that using AI does not diminish artistic identity. "Yes, why not? Artist is a term for people who make art," one commenter asserts.

  2. Skill Division: Others draw a distinction between different art forms. While one commenter acknowledges that AI can generate art, they caution against equating all artistic skills. This sentiment captures the essence of traditional versus modern mediums, illustrating the varied paths creativity can take.

  3. Longevity in Creation: A user shared, "Creative people create. None of those skills disappear if I use AI." Their experience underscores how long-term involvement in various art forms influences perceptions of legitimacy in using technology.

"This sets dangerous precedent" - Top-voted comment emphasizing the complexities of artistic definition

Sentiment Patterns: A Mix of Opinions

Overall, the sentiment is mixed but leans toward acceptance. Creators emphasize personal experiences in defining artistry, suggesting that the medium doesnโ€™t solely dictate identity.

Key Takeaways

  • โ–ณ Personal Experience Matters: Users with extensive artistic backgrounds maintain their identity despite using AI.

  • โ–ฝ Diverse Definitions: There is no consensus on what makes an artist, with many believing that tools do not define creativity.

  • โ€ป Generation Gap: Younger creators are more likely to embrace AI as part of the artistic process compared to traditionalists.

Forging Ahead

As AI continues to grow in art, the question remains: Is the title of artist becoming more inclusive? This clash of opinions may not settle anytime soon, leaving room for ongoing exploration in this evolving arena.

A Glimpse at the Turning Tide

As discussions evolve around AI and artistry, thereโ€™s a strong chance that creators will increasingly blend traditional techniques with AI innovations. Experts estimate that within the next few years, up to 60% of artists may adopt AI in some form, enhancing their craft rather than replacing it. With the younger generation, who have grown up in a digital-first world, leading the way, we could see a more fluid definition of what it means to be an artist. This shift suggests that artistic identity will expand, fostering a community where diverse methods coalesce.

An Artistic Revolution Echoes the Past

This situation mirrors the early 20th-century introduction of photography, which initially faced skepticism from painters. Just as some artists feared that cameras would diminish the essence of their craft, todayโ€™s creatives worry about AI overshadowing traditional artistry. However, just as photography matured into a respected art form rather than a competitor, AI may carve out a similar niche, demonstrating that innovation can coexist harmoniously with tradition.