Edited By
Fatima Rahman
A prominent craft beer competition recently introduced an AI tool for judging without prior notice, leaving judges and members of the brewing industry fuming over the move. This sudden shift in judging methods has ignited discussions on the role of AI in traditionally human-centered fields.
During the judging phase, competitors were faced with an unexpected changeβthe introduction of an AI model to assist human judges. Many believed that beer tasting should rely solely on human experience. Greg Loudon, a certified beer judge, expressed skepticism, stating, "AI doesnβt really have a place in beer."
The reaction was swift. One judge slammed the change as "enshittifying" the tasting process. Others were frustrated, emphasizing that beer tasting is inherently subjective, which an AI can't replicate.
"It attempts to solve a problem that wasnβt a problem before AI showed up," Loudon added in a phone call with sources.
As judges began using the AI tool, many found it cumbersome and ineffective. Describing the experience, one judge said it felt like "parroting back bad versions of your judge tasting notes." This sentiment resonates with reports across various forums where craft beer enthusiasts and judges shared their grievances.
Judges also voiced concerns over data usage, with some claiming they were unwittingly serving as beta testers for a project they didnβt consent to. A letter signed by 33 judges and brewery members called for transparency in how the data was utilized.
In response to the backlash, the Canadian Brewing Awards announced it would step away from the AI project. Their aim was to make winning medals more impactful for breweries, but the uproar over AI's integration led to a reconsideration of their strategies.
"We apologize for the communication gaps and disruptions caused by this yearβs challenges," their Instagram post read.
The apology hints at a recognition of the disconnect between organizers and judges. The row highlights a broader trend, where many creatives are expressing unease about AI's encroachment into artistic territories.
π Judges argue AI lacks the sensitivity needed for beer tasting.
π A letter seeking transparency received 33 endorsements.
π€ Withdrawal from AI initiative shows industry stakeholders are listening to concerns.
As the dust settles, it's clear that the blending of AI into deeply human practices like brewing is far from over. The ongoing discussions signify a pivotal moment for the craft beer community. Will they continue to adapt, or will this lead to a hard stand against tech in their industry? Only time will tell.
In the wake of the backlash against AI in craft beer judging, itβs likely that other competitions will tread carefully as they reconsider their approach. With about a 70% chance, industry leaders may turn to more human-centric judging processes, aiming to preserve the essence of the craft. Meanwhile, several forums may see an uptick in discussions on the balance between technology and tradition. Itβs becoming increasingly clear that brewers prioritize authenticity over efficiency and the drive to innovate must respect the deeply-rooted culture of brewing. Without a clear consensus, competitions may find themselves caught between modern tech and the traditional roots that define their craft.
This brewing controversy echoes the artisan cheese movement that erupted in the late 20th century, where traditionalists fiercely opposed mechanization in cheese-making. Just as craft brewers today are rallying against the incorporation of AI, cheesemakers pushed back against food processing technology that threatened to alter their artisan methods. Both instances serve as testaments to the passion and commitment to craftsmanship and the fierce loyalty to heritage. While technology can aid production, itβs the human touch that defines quality and creativity, reminding us that in a world increasingly driven by automation, the heart of any craft lies in its people.