Edited By
Carlos Mendez
A growing wave of feedback from users raises concerns about the interface of AI Dungeon (AID), leading many to feel that recent improvements may not justify the experience. The discussion centers on ease of use and performance, especially compared to competitor NovelAI (NAI).
In July 2025, a user returning to AID detailed a frustrating experience after making the switch from NAI. Initially drawn back by AID's improved models, the user expressed dissatisfaction with the current interface, pointing out several challenges:
Slow loading times, particularly with minimal text edits.
Lack of intuitive navigation, noting buttons are in awkward positions.
Absence of essential keyboard shortcuts, making simple tasks cumbersome.
The user stated, "I want settings, I want everything laid out, and I donโt want to wait for a page to load on a text site." This sentiment highlights a growing concern about the platform's functionality amidst strong competition.
Comments from various users echo these sentiments, highlighting a shared sense of annoyance with AID's current user experience. One user remarked, "The UI is also very slow and annoying," indicating that concerns about interface speed are widespread. Another expressed their dissatisfaction, stating, "Thereโs a night-and-day difference in UI."
A few themes emerge from the criticisms:
Interface Performance: Many claim the UI is sluggish, with delays affecting workflow.
Space Utilization: Several users pointed to a significant waste of screen space, which hampers usability.
Customization Options: AID lacks the extensive settings found in NAI, frustrating those who desire control over their user experience.
Curiously, discussions around multiplayer functionality in AID brought mixed feelings. Several users noted that multiplayer seems unnecessary for a text-based platform, contributing to interface clutter. One user quipped, "Are you guys seriously playing AID with your friends and family?"
Despite the frustrations, there's a notable appreciation for AIDโs model capabilities. Some users have switched back for better model performance, albeit reluctantly accepting the UI shortcomings.
โ ๏ธ User Interface Fatigue: Many are looking for streamlined, functional UX.
๐ Performance Issues: Significant slowdowns take a toll on user experience.
๐ Mixed Opinions on Multiplayer: Some enjoy the feature, others find it unnecessary.
As AID continues to refine its offerings, will they address these user frustrations? The calls for improvement suggest a need for both functional and aesthetic upgrades to remain competitive in a landscape that values user experience highly.
Given the current frustrations voiced by users, there's a strong chance that AID will prioritize interface upgrades in the near future. Feedback suggests that users are clamoring for a more intuitive and responsive UI, which likely means AID's development team will focus on performance enhancements. Experts estimate around a 70% probability that they will implement user-requested features, such as customizable layouts and keyboard shortcuts, to retain their users and stay competitive against platforms like NAI. If AID can master this balance of functionality and speed, we may witness a revitalization of user loyalty as early as late 2025.
In the realm of sports, the transition of teams to advanced analytics in coaching can serve as an interesting parallel. When basketball teams began focusing on data-driven strategies a little over a decade ago, traditional methods were often met with skepticism and frustration. Fans and athletes alike found it challenging to adapt to the new playstyles that prioritized stats over instinct. Much like AID faces with its interface, teams that resisted adapting to the new data-focused model fell behind, while others that embraced the change saw significant boosts in performance. This shows how innovation can create discomfort, yet also offers a path to substantial improvement over time.