A rising wave of frustration surrounds Appleโs AI developments, amplifying calls for change. Users are increasingly disappointed with Siri and other AI services, prompting discussions on whether Apple can remain relevant against faster competitors by the end of 2025.
Apple's slow pace of innovation has drawn criticism across user boards. Some users feel Apple has become complacent, echoing a familiar narrative from the past. One noted,
"Apple of 20 years ago would lap Apple today."
This sentiment reflects concerns about the company's current strategy being primarily driven by color-coded messaging in messaging apps rather than tech advancements.
Many comments highlight Siri's shortcomings, with one frustrated user stating,
"Siri is the dumbest of the 'smart' assists and Apple is slow as hell."
Such remarks underscore a perception that Siri is lagging behind rivals like Google Assistant and Alexa.
Discussions have arisen regarding the broader implications of Apple's innovation slowdown in comparison to tech giants in the global AI race. One comment raised a critical perspective,
"Aren't the AI in Western society behind in general?"
This highlights doubts about Apple's capacity to innovate and keep pace, especially against the backdrop of advancements from countries like China.
As the conversation shifts towards what the future holds, users propose various ideas Apple could explore to regain momentum:
Enhanced voice assistant: A product that truly competes with others.
Health and fitness AI applications: Utilizing existing features within Apple's ecosystem.
A competitive product to NotebookLM: This could significantly boost productivity.
AI integrated into Siri: Integration with advanced AI models could improve performance rapidly, potentially revamping its relevance.
An interesting proposal from a comment suggested that Apple could benefit from building collaborative platforms that encourage partnerships with AI developers.
"They need new leadership or they'll be Nokia in 10 years," warned one critic, giving voice to the fear of becoming irrelevant.
๐ฅ Stagnation Concerns: Users are worried Appleโs focus is on trivial features rather than genuine innovation.
๐ Need for Collaboration: Calls for Apple to adopt a more open ecosystem to attract third-party AI contributions.
๐ Leadership and Vision: Discussions point to a possible need for a shift in leadership to revive Appleโs innovative spirit.
With an increasing demand for significant AI advancements, experts suggest a 60% likelihood that Apple will reveal a more competitive product by the end of 2025. If Apple takes its usersโ feedback seriously, it could be a pivotal moment for reclaiming lost ground.
Curiously, the nature of competition and user expectations will likely shape the future of AI at Apple.