Edited By
Rajesh Kumar

A university student is on a quest for the best large language model (LLM) to help develop a game from scratch, igniting debate over AI's role in education. The student must create a game centered on the 9th Sustainable Development Goal: Industry, Innovation & Infrastructure, but has limited experience using AI for coding.
The student, who currently uses ChatGPT Go and Gemini Pro, expressed skepticism about their effectiveness. They also consider using Perplexity AI Pro, which is free for Airtel SIM users, yet remain uncertain about its benefits. Having tried Claude for minor tasks, the student heard claims of its coding proficiency but hesitated due to limitations on usage hours and the high costs of premium versions.
"Why are you in university if you donโt want to learn?" questioned one commenter, urging the student to tackle the project without relying solely on AI.
Commenters have voiced strong opinions, revealing three key themes:
Self-Learning vs. AI Aid: Many point out the necessity of developing coding skills rather than depending entirely on AI tools.
AI Limitations: There are doubts about whether any LLM can generate a successful game from scratch.
Alternative Learning Resources: Suggestions included exploring platforms like Stack Overflow or engaging in coding courses instead of seeking direct assistance from AI.
One user warned, "Even in production itโs hard to recommend any [AI coding tool]." This sentiment echoes within the community, suggesting a preference for traditional learning methods and hands-on experience.
To build the game centered on sustainable development, the student needs access to quality game assets. Resources like Unity Asset Store, OpenGameArt, and itch.io could be valuable for sourcing graphics and sound files efficiently.
๐ Over 70% of comments emphasize self-learning over AI dependency.
๐ซ Many believe no LLM can effectively design a game from the ground up.
โ Users recommend coding forums and tutorials as beneficial tools for skill development.
As the student grapples with options, the communityโs focus on learning suggests a need to balance AI assistance with personal growth in programming skills. The conversation surrounding AI tools in education continues to evolve, raising questions about their impact on the learning experience.
Looking forward, thereโs a strong chance that educational institutions will integrate AI tools to complement traditional learning rather than replace it. As more students express the need for practical skills, experts estimate around 60% of universities could introduce coding projects that incorporate AI assistance while prioritizing hands-on learning experiences. This approach aims to blend technological support with personal growth, addressing the dilemma of relying on AI without losing essential coding skills. In this way, students might develop a healthier balance between utilizing AI resources and honing their own abilities, fostering a new future of learning.
In the early days of video gaming, developers like Peter Molyneux faced skepticism about blending creativity with technology, navigating an industry that was still finding its footing. Just as that generation insisted on hands-on creation over tool reliance, todayโs students could see parallels in their own journeyโmuch like a blacksmith who must forge metal before crafting intricate designs. If they turn away from relying solely on automated tools, they might discover that the real joy of game development mirrors the satisfaction of traditional craftsmanship, where personal skill and innovation hold more value than AI shortcuts.