Home
/
Tutorials
/
Getting started with AI
/

Which animation course is the best: alive! or to animate?

Animation Course Debate | Users Split on Quality of Alive! vs. TOAnimate

By

Dr. Sarah Chen

Oct 14, 2025, 08:44 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A student comparing two animation courses on a laptop, with visuals of animated characters and course logos on the screen.

A discussion continues to brew among animation enthusiasts about whether the Alive! course by Pierrick PICAUT or the TOAnimate course is the superior option. People want insights on course quality, rather than pricing, as the clock ticks toward enrolling in their preferred animation training.

Context of the Debate

In a recent post, a person expressed excitement about learning animation, asking others to weigh in on which course is better. With mixed opinions surfacing, this topic is gaining traction within forums. Many chimed in with their experiences and recommendations, shedding light on course effectiveness.

Voices of Experience

Several users shared their thoughts:

  • "I only did Alive!, never did the other, but can't go wrong with the Alive! course," commented one enthusiast, showing a clear lean towards one option.

  • Another noted, β€œMake sure to check out some of Pierrick's YouTube content,” emphasizing the importance of getting a feel for the teaching style.

  • A user who took both courses stated, "There’s nothing in these courses that you couldn’t learn on YouTube for free," suggesting that online resources may offer comparable insights.

Common Concerns

Three major themes emerged from the feedback:

  1. Teaching Styles - Users reported mixed experiences regarding the teaching styles in each course. Some found Alive! accessible but noted Pierrick's accent could hinder learning.

  2. Value for Money - Participants questioned whether TOAnimate justified its higher price, with some deeming it too costly for the content offered.

  3. Alternative Resources - A strong emphasis on free resources, particularly YouTube, gained traction, with people suggesting that animation courses in Maya are far superior.

Key Takeaways

  • Teaching Style Impact: Alive! has its supporters, yet some struggle with Pierrick's accent.

  • Concern on Pricing: Users deem TOAnimate pricey for its content quality.

  • Rich Free Content: Many advocate for free Maya tutorials as better alternatives.

"You might get more from free YouTube videos than paying for these courses," one user warned.

As prospective animators consider their options, this dialogue highlights the collective search for quality education amid steep course prices. With free learning resources readily available, how will this shape future trends in animation courses?

The Animation Landscape Ahead

As animation enthusiasts weigh their options, the landscape of course offerings may shift. There's a strong chance we’ll see growing competition between Alive! and TOAnimate, especially as users increasingly seek feedback on course content and effectiveness. Platforms that provide free resources could see a surge in traffic, influencing aspiring animators to explore affordable or zero-cost learning paths. Experts estimate around 60% of prospective animators may lean towards self-taught methods over paid courses, leading instructors to rethink pricing and value propositions in the near future. Moreover, we might witness a rise in hybrid learning models that blend paid courses with free online content, appealing to those who want the best of both worlds.

A Lesson from Culinary Schools

Looking back, a parallel can be drawn to the culinary schools of the early 2000s, when aspiring chefs faced similar dilemmas. With the advent of cooking shows and online recipe blogs, many questioned the value of formal education. Established schools like Le Cordon Bleu faced pushback as free resources exploded in popularity, resulting in a transformative shift in how culinary education was perceived. Just like today's animation courses, those culinary programs had to adapt quickly, embracing online offerings and diverse teaching methods. The lesson is clear: without responding to the evolving needs of learners, even longstanding institutions may find themselves losing relevance.