ChatGPT 5 Sparks Controversy | Users Claim Increased Censorship on Health Topics

A growing coalition of users is pushing back against the censorship they experience with ChatGPT 5, particularly around health-related inquiries. The latest wave of frustration is visible on various forums where individuals complain that innocent questions about subjects like pregnancy face unexpected denials.

Users Report Censorship for Non-Sexual Topics

Many users express their displeasure over what they perceive as excessive filtering. One pregnant individual mentioned they were simply seeking factual advice when the AI refused to engage, warning that discussions might lead to explicit content. This points to an apparent issue where legitimate discussions are being mistaken for inappropriate content.

Comments on forums echo this sentiment. Some users report similar experiences when trying to address other health-related topics. One noted, "Don’t ask AI anything related to pregnancy or health."

Creative Workarounds Emerge

In light of these restrictions, some users have resorted to using older models, claiming it provides a more lenient experience. One posted, "I discovered a simple way around all this if you use 4o" This workaround has garnered attention, yet there’s a clear sentiment against openly sharing these hacking strategies, for fear of further tightening the platform's filters.

Moreover, emotional stories reveal dire scenarios. A user seeking support for fears around hospitals expressed deep frustration, stating, "Every refusal I get is scaring me more." The pattern of denial around emotionally charged topics like health appears to only exacerbate user anxieties.

Sentiments and Highlights of User Feedback

"This is so traumatizing I can’t even TELL you about it" - highlighted by a concerned user, resonating with many in similar tough situations.

The overall mood remains bleak, with many feeling lost in an overly cautious system that inhibits open discussion about critical issues they face.

Key Insights

• △ User discontent is rising as more highlight censorship on benign health inquiries.

• ▽ Growing dissatisfaction leads many to revert to using older AI models.

• ※ "I just wanted some advice, not this hassle" - reflects common frustration.

As discussions evolve, many wonder: Will future updates take user feedback seriously and reconsider their censorship policies? Or will dissatisfaction continue to pave the way toward seeking alternative AI tools?