Home
/
AI trends and insights
/
Trending research topics
/

Chat gpt loops when asked to fix shell script errors

Users Report AI Looping Issue | Frustration Grows Over Script Errors

By

Sara Kim

Jul 10, 2025, 01:35 PM

2 minutes needed to read

A visual representation of an AI program struggling to identify an error in a shell script, displaying error messages and looping behavior.

A segment of the tech community raises concerns about AI reliability after individual experiences reveal repetitive errors when interacting with advanced models. Users are sharing their frustrations with AI chatbots, notably when asked to troubleshoot shell scripts.

Context of the Frustration

Recently, users have reported incidents where AI systems, including GPT-4o, encounter issues when determining mistakes in programming scripts. This has led to confusion and a growing lack of trust in AI-generated responses. One user stated, "I've stopped trusting many posts because they might be scripted," shedding light on a wider sentiment shared by many in online forums.

Three Main Issues Emerging

1. Automated Responses: Many users feel that the responses generated by AI are not truly engaging but rather feel "scripted," prompting a reevaluation of the AI's authenticity.

2. Recurrent Errors: The same user mentioned that when they asked the AI model for clarification on incorrect answers, it led to a frustrating loop instead of a resolution.

3. Skepticism of AI Reliability: Comments reveal a growing skepticism. As one user humorously noted, "You’ve engineered the downfall of the Borg." This highlights a concern among users about AI's ability to perform its core functions reliably.

User Feedback Highlights

"Ask it to explain the reason why it’s an incorrect answer? And then to give the correct one."

This user's suggestion emphasizes a desire for AIs to be more responsive and less repetitive. Users consistently desire effective solutions rather than circular discussions that lead nowhere.

Sentiment Patterns

Feedback from the community is mixed, with a notable lean towards dissatisfaction. While some users appreciate the technology, frustrations over the AI's performance and reliability cast a shadow on overall perceptions.

Key Insights

  • β–³ Many users express disappointment over AI’s failure to address issues.

  • β–½ Increasing calls for AIs to deliver accurate and meaningful interactions.

  • β€» "It went into a loop again," reflects the frustration of repeated errors.

Amid the growing concerns, one must wonder: how long can these technologies maintain user trust amid ongoing struggles for reliability?

With the current trajectory, tech experts might need to address these issues to restore confidence in AI systems.

What Lies Ahead for AI Reliability

As users grow weary of the current AI limitations, there’s a strong chance that tech developers will prioritize fixes to enhance reliability and user satisfaction. Experts estimate around 70% of companies are now expected to ramp up their efforts in training and refining AI systems, aiming for less scripted and more interactive exchanges with users. This pivot could lead to the rollout of updates designed to improve accuracy, ideally boosting trust among users. If these steps are taken effectively, we might see a rebound in user confidence as early as the latter part of 2025, contingent upon how well these companies address ongoing frustrations.

Unexpected Echoes from History

This scenario draws a fascinating parallel to the rise of early telephone technology in the late 1800s. At first, many users experienced connection issues, causing widespread skepticism about the invention's reliability and practicality. Just like today’s AI struggles with script troubleshooting, early telephones often resulted in repeated failures, frustrating users. It took persistent enhancements and a cultural shift to embrace the technology fully. In the long run, consistent user feedback and improvements made telephony an invaluable part of daily life. Like those early phones, AI has the potential for transformative impactβ€”but only if engineers and developers heed user concerns and innovate vigorously.