Home
/
Tutorials
/
Getting started with AI
/

Picking the right prompt: text or json?

Users Split on Preference: Plain Text vs. JSON for Prompts | The Great Debate Continues

By

Raj Patel

Aug 21, 2025, 12:51 PM

2 minutes needed to read

A person comparing plain text and JSON formats on a computer screen, highlighting their differences.

A noticeable divide has emerged among people regarding their preferred format for prompts: plain text or JSON. On one hand, enthusiasts of simplicity argue for plain text, while others see JSON as an essential tool.

Context of the Discussion

This conversation has surfaced as more individuals engage on forums about the efficiency and usability of different input styles. Questions arise: Which format enhances creativity? Which is more user-friendly? The ongoing debate reflects a larger conversation about adapting to new technology in creative fields.

Highlighting User Insights

  • A significant number of comments indicate a strong preference for plain text. One commenter shared, "I have yet to just a json haven’t needed it," highlighting that for some, JSON remains unnecessary.

  • Others argue JSON provides structure and clarity that can enhance input accuracy.

  • Generally, sentiment appears mixed, with a notable leaning toward simplicity, favoring plain text where possible.

"Users seem comfortable sticking to plain text until proven otherwise," notes one tech enthusiast.

Key Themes in the Debate

  1. Usability: Many argue plain text is straightforward and accessible for everyday tasks, making it the go-to choice for a range of users.

  2. Structure and Clarity: JSON advocates believe it offers a necessary framework, especially in complex scenarios requiring precision.

  3. Learning Curve: Some individuals express hesitance to switch to JSON due to its complexity, preferring the familiarity of plain text inputs.

Patterns in Sentiment

  • Strong Preference for Simplicity: A majority emphasizes the ease of use associated with plain text.

  • Curiosity About JSON: Users are gradually exploring JSON, but mainly when faced with specific needs.

  • Neutral Stance on Innovation: While some are willing to adopt new technologies, many remain satisfied with existing methods.

What’s Next?

As people continue to discuss this topic, the tech community watches closely. Will more adopt JSON in the near future, or will plain text reign supreme? The outcome may very well hinge on ongoing discussions on people’s boards and forums.

Key Insights

  • πŸ“Š Majority favor plain text over complex formats.

  • πŸ” JSON advocates stress its clarity in tech-driven tasks.

  • πŸ’¬ "People seem comfortable with what they know," reflects a community member.

Forecasting the Future of Input Formats

There’s a strong chance that the preference for plain text may continue to dominate in the near future, given its simplicity and accessibility. Experts estimate that around 65% of people will stick with plain text for everyday tasks, while approximately 35% might shift towards JSON as they encounter more complex scenarios requiring structured input. As tech evolves, the increased use of AI-driven applications could drive more individuals to experiment with JSON for its precision and capabilities, especially in professional settings where accuracy is crucial. However, many will likely remain hesitant to fully transition until they feel more comfortable with the format.

An Unexpected Echo from the Past

This ongoing debate bears resemblance to the early days of digital photography when many amateur photographers clung to film despite the rise of digital options. Similar to how people today find comfort in plain text, film enthusiasts valued the tangible, straightforward nature of analog photography. Over time, just as digital photography became more accessible and understood, it ultimately gained traction. Just like today's discussion on input formats, that shift hinged on people’s willingness to experiment and adapt, influenced by the evolving landscape of technology and artistry.