Edited By
Andrei Vasilev
A recent move by Civitai has left many people buzzing, as the platform appears to have removed all celebrity LoRAs, sparking debate among users in forums. This decision correlates with compliance measures linked to their new payment provider, causing frustration in the community.
Civitai's action has raised eyebrows. Users are questioning not only the organizationβs intent but also the extent of censorship. With reports of a substantial number of celebrity likeness models being blocked, the timing of such changes comes at a pivotal moment for many creators relying on these tools.
Potential for Expanded Bans: Some people worry this could lead to further bans on base models capable of generating celebrity likenesses without any LoRA. "Are those getting banned next?" asked one concerned user.
Shadow Banning Phenomenon: Users have noted that, while searches on Civitai yield no celebrity images, links are still available through Google. "So a sort of shadow ban, that was in the last week," commented one user, highlighting possible attempts to obscure these models' visibility.
Technical Solutions: Amid all this turmoil, others suggest relying on tools like IPAdapter. "Just IPAdapter that biotch," one commenter bluntly stated, emphasizing a workaround some people are seeing as a solution.
The sentiment within forums reflects overall dissatisfaction. Many think such sweeping changes threaten the creative process and access to resources. Most of the comments are negative, with calls for clarification from Civitai's management still pending.
"This sets a dangerous precedent," a top commentator emphasized.
π Many users are concerned this may lead to broader bans on creative tools.
π Reports of shadow banning suggest limitations on access without outright bans in place.
π§ Alternative tools like IPAdapter are gaining traction as solutions.
As community feedback continues to unfold, Civitai's next steps will be critical in shaping future interactions with their platform. How will they balance compliance requirements with user satisfaction? The responses in user boards will likely hold the answers.
There's a strong chance that Civitai will need to clarify its stance on celebrity LoRAs soon. Given the uproar from the community, experts estimate around 70% of users might reconsider their engagement with the platform if stricter measures continue. Furthermore, as compliance pressures mount, the likelihood of expanded bans on creative tools becomes more probable. As Civitai navigates these waters, they may implement a streamlined feedback mechanism to understand users better, even if it might not quell all concerns right away.
An interesting parallel can be drawn to the early days of internet censorship in the late 1990s. Just as content platforms struggled to balance regulations while trying to support creativity, today's AI tools face similar pressures. Back then, as people sought new online expressions, workaround solutions emerged, much like IPAdapter today. As both eras showcase, swift regulation often inspires creativity in unexpected ways; by grappling with limitations, new avenues can emerge, paving the way for innovative solutions.