Edited By
Luis Martinez

A growing number of game developers appears to be seeking feedback and collaboration, despite recent pushback on submission guidelines at some forums. In a recent post, a developer called for advice on submissions to the 2025 20s jam, highlighting differing opinions from their peers.
The developer, with over 30 years spent in corporate tech, has only recently dived into game development as a hobby. Their entries include titles like D20 Curling and Frogmachine, with the latter receiving the most development time. Surprisingly, the developer stressed that the act of submitting is already a personal win for them.
However, feedback from the community has been mixed. Some members welcomed the initiative, while others criticized the request due to the platform's policies. A common sentiment suggests that the forum isnโt meant for pitch posts. One user stated, > "Consider making a detailed article on your development process."
Some in the community feel that more guidance on where to share projects is necessary. Others recommended alternative platforms for showcasing work, including forums like r/indiegames and r/GamedevScreens.
The dialogue around this topic sparked further conversation:
"Dev discussions are a great way to learn!"
"Posting your process can be really beneficial for others."
**"This forum isnโt for showcasing projects, though."
๐ Many believe in sharing development processes: Community members suggest it fosters learning.
๐ Calls to action for better forum guidelines continue to rise.
โ๏ธ "This forum isnโt the place to showcase your project." - A reiteration of existing guidelines.
As developers navigate these platforms, it raises the question: How can they effectively share their work while adhering to community standards? The conversation continues as more hobbyist developers emerge, eager to learn and grow.
Thereโs a strong chance weโll see an increase in developers turning to independent forums for feedback, as many prioritize community over established norms. With the rise of hobbyist creators, around 65% of them may choose to seek spaces that better accommodate their needs, leading to potential shifts in submission policies across various platforms. These changes could foster environments that encourage open dialogue, while veteran developers might also join in, attracted by the learning opportunities. Collaboration could flourish as newcomers find mentors willing to share insights on navigating community standards effectively.
The current debate on submission practices mirrors the rise of early photography in the 19th century, when amateurs struggled for legitimacy against established artists. Just as photography aficionados sought informal galleries to showcase their work and validate their craft, todayโs game developers are carving their own niches within forums. This historical parallel showcases how, over time, communities can reshape standards and values, allowing innovation to thrive amid resistance, and highlights the importance of belonging in creative processes.