Home
/
Community engagement
/
Forums
/

Is it worth compressing big game ideas for solo devs?

Can Solo Developers Streamline Big Game Ideas? | Discussion Grows Among Game Makers

By

Dr. Emily Carter

Jan 8, 2026, 06:12 AM

Edited By

Carlos Mendez

Updated

Jan 8, 2026, 06:13 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A solo game developer at a desk, creating plans and sketches for a role-playing game on a laptop and paper.
popular

A surge of opinions among developers raises questions about the ability of solo creators to condense grand game ideas into feasible projects. With over 20 comments on the topic, a mix of insights highlights both the challenges and possibilities of scaling down ambitious concepts.

The Challenge of Simplification

Many solo developers harbor dreams of creating expansive RPGs filled with complex systems and compelling narratives. One developer noted, "If your experience exceeds a decade, you may know best if your vision exceeds your capacity." Others added that tackling large ideas often requires smart compromises and a willingness to accept limitations.

Interestingly, some creators suggest a stepwise approach: "If you want a significant project, break each section into smaller pieces instead of trying to replicate AAA quality."

Community Reactions and Strategies

Feedback reflects a mixture of skepticism and hope. Many believe scaling back can help maintain core appeal, while others express concern over potential dilution of the product. Key strategies discussed include:

  • Start with Small Goals:

    "To finish games, you must often cut down your vision further than expected."

  • Focus on Core Mechanics:

"Identify your core gameplay loop early on."

  • Avoid Complications:

    Simplifying systems can yield a stronger end product.

Some commenters pointed to successful examples, such as Kenshi, a game initially created by a solo developer that later expanded as a team formed.

Perspectives on Game Feasibility

The ongoing debate centers around the feasibility and value of simplifying complex narratives and designs. As voiced by a contributor, one must choose between a streamlined vision and a more inflated ambitionโ€”"Considering all the necessary time and effort, if you're not ready for a solo endeavor, opt for a simpler project."

"You might add an area or boss instead, as the time spent enhancing simple designs might yield greater returns," remarked one participant, emphasizing a preference for depth.

Key Insights from the Discussion

  • ๐Ÿš€ Strategic Simplification: Smart trade-offs can make ambitious ideas achievable.

  • ๐ŸŽฏ Realistic Expectations: Willingness to compromise is crucial; from artwork to mechanics.

  • ๐Ÿ’ก Engaging Designs: Emphasizing essence in game concepts can lead to surprising player interest.

While the discussion remains open-ended, a clear trend emerges: innovative strategies are surfacing. As thousands of indie creators are now synthesizing grand ideas into smaller, engaging experiences, the landscape for solo developers is evolving. Many predict a newfound audience appreciation for well-designed minimalistic games, suggesting potential success for unique, smaller projects. As they experiment with narrower scopes, new avenues for storytelling may arise, paving the way for the next era of indie hits.