New Grad's Creative Strategy for Patent Sample | Community Weighs In
A recent computer science graduate is tackling the task of crafting a writing sample for a patent agent role, focusing on AI and ML. This candidate deleted past papers, sparking discussions about the relevance and depth required in their mock submission.
Navigating the Writing Sample Challenge
The graduate is preparing for the patent bar exam and plans to write a mock response to an Office Action. As they search for the right patent application, they face several considerations:
Avoid ongoing applications to steer clear of plagiarism worries.
Utilize AI/ML expertise to align with today’s market demand.
Choose a concise application for easier analysis.
Focus on a specific application that received two Office Actions, concluding with a Final Rejection.
The selected application is from 2018, which raises concerns about its brief nature and age relevance.
Insights from the Community
Reactions within the forums reveal a mix of support and skepticism:
"You want a technical paper, not a legal/patent law paper," one commenter remarked, urging the graduate to focus on technical content rather than legal theory.
Another participant said, "This looks like a great piece to use. Edit or update it for clarity."
Concerns about what constitutes adequate technical depth were common.
Some commenters suggested that the length might detract from showcasing writing skills, while others believe that clarity and effective communication should take precedence.
A number of contributors advised reaching out to professors for past coursework, which could provide a solid foundation for the writing sample.
Key Themes Emerging
Technical Focus: Many emphasized the importance of demonstrating a solid understanding of technology. A commenter pointed out, "The expectation is that you can explain the tech space you’re hired for."
Clarity Over Length: Several voices echoed that clarity is more critical in technical writing than application length or age, stating that good communication is paramount.
Editing Importance: Suggestions included polishing existing work for flow, revealing that review and refinement are key in presenting the sample effectively.
Key Insights
✍️ Clarity remains king: Hiring managers prioritize how well ideas are communicated.
📑 Tech relevance is crucial: Applications should show a grasp of the subject matter.
🔍 Exploration of past work: Old academic papers may still hold value if they highlight expertise.
As the graduate continues to navigate the complex task of preparing a writing sample, community feedback provides crucial insights. Can they balance personal experience with the expectations of the patent law industry? The debate continues as they prepare to make their mark.