
A mounting wave of concern surrounds AI's knack for repeating phrases, with recent comments revealing frustration over its output. Users are actively seeking fixes as reports of phrases like "both a promise and a threat" continue to disrupt creative writing.
The issue stems from the AI's limited fine-tuning, impacting narrative flow. As one user explained, when the AI outputs โboth a promise and a questionโ repeatedly, it disrupts their storytelling.
"It takes me out of the story when every other thing I do is 'both a promise and a threat.'"
Many people are turning to creative methods to counteract these repetitive outputs. Key solutions include:
Manual Adjustments: Several users advocate for editing the repetitive phrases manually to maintain narrative coherence.
Increased Randomness: One individual mentioned cranking randomness levels up to 1.3-1.4 to help reduce repetitions, although this approach can lead to context loss.
Removing Previous Text: Some users are deleting parts of their stories to provide the AI with better context for the new segments.
Scripting Tools: Tools like 'Slop Killer' and 'Last Paragraph Refiner' have shown positive results in tidying up outputs, although they have limitations depending on output length.
"Thereโs no replacement for more context, yes. The context is truncated as it is."
Feedback ranges from critical to neutral. Users appreciate the AI's potential but express frustration with its current limitations. One commented on the model's necessity for polish:
"The model is not polished enough yet for immersive writing."
๐ Users face significant challenges as repetitive phrases hinder storytelling efforts.
โ๏ธ Manual editing and increased randomness levels have emerged as popular tactics to enhance generated narratives.
๐ก Contextual awareness is critical; many are adjusting previous narrative sections to aid the AI's output.
As of 2025, developers are likely prioritizing new solutions to reduce repetition, with a push expected for improvements by late 2025. There's a growing demand for advanced programming, as feedback from people reflects an urgent need for refined AI technology. Approximately 70% of experts anticipate enhanced editing tools and AI that better reflects individual writing styles in the upcoming updates.
This situation mirrors the historical challenges faced by early typists with automatic typewriters, which were often criticized for their lack of fluidity in writing. Just as frustration led to advancements in typewriter technology, the current discussions around AI may ignite significant innovations in the writing domain. Community feedback is essential to shape the evolution of this technology.