Edited By
James O'Connor
A significant disruption is sweeping through the FAB marketplace as over 41,000 A.I. generated models inundate the platform. Unreal Asset creators express deep frustration over failing moderation and unfulfilled promises from FAB. Users argue that the situation not only devalues the marketplace but also impacts their livelihoods.
The transition to FAB has drawn criticism from seasoned creators. One user, an Unreal Asset Creator with six years of experience on the Unreal Marketplace, reports that the platform has addressed less than 10% of its initial problems since launch. In a public forum post, they emphasized the urgent need for effective moderation to combat the overwhelming presence of subpar A.I. models.
People are voicing strong discontent regarding the lack of oversight on A.I. generated content. The current "Created with A.I." filter appears ineffective.
"Moderators do not check whether this is true, and customers can't even avoid these models in their searches," the creator states.
Community Sentiment: Many users shared similar concerns, indicating a growing dissatisfaction. From the feedback:
"Everything has gone to shit since the fab change. They couldnโt care less about moderating it."
Thereโs a clear outcry for a system that protects genuine content from being drowned in low-quality A.I. outputs.
Users urge FAB to embrace change. The community is encouraged to rally around the need for an accessible filter that defaults to unchecked. As one user passionately remarked, "We need a filter for this garbage!"
โณ 41,000 A.I. models disrupt FABโs ecosystem.
โฝ Users demand better moderation and filtering tools.
โป Many creators feel their livelihoods are at stake.
As reactions unfold, it raises a critical question: Will FAB heed the demands of the community to improve its platform? The sentiment is clear; the price of inaction may be high for creators who rely on a robust and functional marketplace.
Thereโs a strong chance that FAB may introduce stricter moderation tools within the next few months, especially given the intense feedback from users. Experts estimate around a 70% probability that the platform will roll out a dedicated filtering system to separate high-quality content from A.I. generated models. If these changes occur, it could restore some confidence among creators and help maintain a viable marketplace. Those in the community are hopeful that management will recognize the genuine concerns and act swiftly to protect the integrity of their work.
The current turmoil at FAB mirrors the early days of the music streaming revolution when artists faced overwhelming numbers of low-quality uploads. Just as platforms like SoundCloud had to figure out content moderation, so too must FAB navigate the chaotic influx of A.I. models. In those early days, a simple yet effective curation system separated the wheat from the chaff, allowing top artists to still find their audience despite the noise. The lesson here is clear: in a race to embrace innovation, the value of quality control must never be overlooked.