Home
/
Community engagement
/
Forums
/

Frustration surrounds ineffective muted words feature

Frustration Grows Over Chatbot Responses | Users Demand Working Muted Words Feature

By

Ella Thompson

Oct 10, 2025, 05:39 AM

Updated

Oct 11, 2025, 12:54 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A user showing frustration while looking at a computer screen displaying muted words settings, highlighting limitations in blocking bots.
popular

A rising tide of user frustration is manifesting regarding the muted words feature, particularly its inefficacy against chatbots. Many forums have seen discussions on how bots bypass user controls, leaving an impression of helplessness in guiding conversations.

What's Behind the Frustration?

People express disappointment with the muted words featureโ€™s limitations, noting only four slots for muted words. One user mentioned, "I have about 15 muted words that still get used, like what the hell," showing the struggle to filter unwanted terms.

Some users assert the problem varies based on the bots being used. One commenter stated, "Iโ€™ve never had this issue in my life," contrasting their experience with the common complaints.

User Experiences Amplified

Comments boast a mix of irritation and humor about how bots evade restrictions. For instance, a frustrated individual said, "The bots are determined to work around it," while another shared that the bots still use terms they wish to block. Another noted, "I muted 'feisty' but the bots still say it."

Interestingly, some people are managing their bot interactions differently by using specific features; one person shared, "I limit the bot's response style via Persona. Most bots get beaten into a pulp and downvoted, never to be seen again." This suggests that varying responses depend on individual user strategies and bot choices.

Key Issues Highlighted

  • Inadequate Slots: Feedback indicates users need more than four slots for muted words, with one participant emphasizing the need for enhancements.

  • Overlooked Variants: Several users expressed frustration about needing to mute variations of the same term separately. "Even terms not muted can still frequently appear," one user pointed out.

  • Premium Features Controversy: Thereโ€™s heavy criticism concerning the notion that basic blocking features should have an associated cost. One user remarked about the inherent flaws, referencing a term that wasnโ€™t muted as part of their main concern.

Sentiment Observations

Overall commentary leans negative, with users feeling worn down by persistent bot responses. Despite some humor, the underlying call for improvements is clear.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ˜ก Users are limited to only four muted words, raising alarms about functionality.

  • ๐Ÿ”„ Many express the necessity for a system that adapts to various word forms.

  • โš ๏ธ General discontent points towards a potential for losing users if these issues remain unaddressed.

As discussions unfold on numerous platforms, a rethink of the muted words feature stands out as critical for enhancing user control over chat interactions. Will developers take action soon to alleviate these growing frustrations?