Home
/
Latest news
/
AI breakthroughs
/

Did google delay the start of the ai bubble?

A rising chorus of voices is intensifying discussion around claims that Google stifled AI progress. Insiders suggest strategic decisions may have hindered advancements, triggering concerns about the company's future in a fiercely competitive market.

By

Anika Rao

Oct 11, 2025, 05:13 AM

Updated

Oct 12, 2025, 01:35 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A graphical representation of Google and OpenAI logos with a timeline showing the delay of Google's AI project Meena compared to ChatGPT-3.
popular

Undeniable Impact of Google's Decisions

Internal sources indicate Google developed an advanced language model, Meena, back in 2019. However, the company withheld its release due to fears of jeopardizing ad revenue. A commenter pointedly asked, "Why would they give up three years of revenue?" This focus on profit seems quite evident.

Competing in a Rapidly Evolving Landscape

As Microsoft ramped up investments in OpenAI and launched ChatGPT-3 in mid-2022, experts assert Google's choices were deeply influenced by competitive forces. "Google might not have moved if OpenAI hadnโ€™t made waves with its model,โ€ an ex-employee adds. The pressures led Google to expedite the creation of its Gemini AI model, although skepticism surrounds its capabilities.

Commenters voiced their doubts about the effectiveness of Gemini, with one saying, "Bard was highly inferior with its initial functions," hinting that just responding to competition may not drive true innovation. A user added, โ€œSome believe Google is lagging in the race due to internal mismanagement, despite having the tech.โ€

Assessing AI Model Quality

Debates remain heated over the real advancements in AI models through the years. A forum participant remarked, "I doubt ChatGPT-3 is much better than Meena, especially considering the parameter difference." While several insiders agree, one such user emphasized, "Meena was impressive for 2019/2020 with its parameters and focus on conversational sensibleness," but ultimately sensed its limitations compared to GPT-3.

Interestingly, Meena was centered around chat-specific functions, while OpenAI's GPT-3 showcased broad capabilities, advantageous for various applications. Another participant argued releasing Meena in 2019 wouldnโ€™t have translated to three years of advancement in the field of LLMs. They claimed, "The real leaps came from massive scaling and data," contrasting Google's risk-averse nature to OpenAI's more aggressive approach in rolling out new models.

Googleโ€™s Path Forward

Current sentiments reflect a mix of frustration and cautious optimism, indicating that many see a seized opportunity in Google's delays while others doubt whether the tech giant can regain its competitive edge.

Key Takeaways

  • โœธ Googleโ€™s reluctance to launch Meena primarily stemmed from fears of ad revenue loss.

  • โœท Competitive moves by Microsoft prompted Google to unveil its AI models rapidly.

  • โœฆ Many question the actual advancements in model capabilities between Meena and ChatGPT-3, pointing out that newer models far exceed the original metrics.

As the AI realm grows, will Google learn from past hesitations, or will it remain in the shadows while others accelerate?

"Without competition forcing their hand, we might still be tinkering with smaller models today."

With the future of AI hanging in the balance, the true test will be how Google navigates its path ahead.