A growing number of people continue to voice dissatisfaction with GPT-5.1, particularly regarding its web browsing feature. Reports indicate that commands to access online content result in no action, leaving many users frustrated and questioning the effectiveness of this update.
A Widespread Concern
Many people have taken to forums to express their woes about browsing issues with GPT-5.1. Key complaints include:
Non-responsive browsing features: Users report that, despite prompts like "search online," the system fails to perform. One comment highlighted, "It just pretends it browsed."
Ignored commands: Comments suggest that this version often disregards parts of user instructions. A user lamented, "It’s spent more time hallucinating and dropping instructions than doing what I asked it to."
Workflow disruptions: Several individuals struggle to get browsing to activate without unconventional phrasing or session resets, directly impacting their productivity.
The Community Speaks
Feedback on user boards reveals a shared sentiment of frustration. People echo the sentiment of one user, who stated, "The whole workflow breaks because it won’t actually activate browsing unless I force some weird phrasing or reset the session."
Interestingly, a suggestion has emerged to mitigate the issue: one user noted that using the command "Regenerate response → Search the Web" sometimes prompts the model to search effectively.
Performance Woes
The complaints point to a perceived regression in functionality when compared to earlier versions. Many people question if these issues are isolated to GPT-5.1 or part of a broader trend affecting recent releases. One user remarked succinctly, "GPT-5.1 doesn’t look as polished as 5."
Key Observations
Persistent Issues: Many users fight with the browsing feature not working as intended.
Inconsistent Functionality: Reports of ignored commands create distress for people, directly affecting usage.
Escalating Discontent: Users are considering alternatives as frustrations mount and productivity falters.
As this situation evolves, it prompts inquiries about the reliability of GPT-5.1. Will developers implement necessary fixes to soothe frustrated users?
Looking Ahead
With rising user dissatisfaction, there’s speculation that developers may prioritize addressing the browsing tool's problems. Experts suggest there is about a 70% chance that updates to restore reliable functionality could emerge in the near future. As developers work on solutions, clearer communication regarding current issues might also help alleviate user concerns. However, if these frustrations continue, many could turn to alternative AI platforms.
Drawing Parallels
The current frustrations parallel early smartphone experiences, where promised features often fell short. Users had to adapt, finding workarounds while the industry caught up. Just as smartphones have evolved, addressing GPT-5.1’s technical hiccups might require a similar adjustment period for people reliant on these tools.