Test Uncovers Shortcomings in GPT-5's View on Evolutionary Theory | AI Debate Intensifies
A recent examination of GPT-5’s reasoning raised eyebrows over its understanding of evolutionary mutations. The discussion has stirred controversy, as many argue the AI’s interpretations clash with established biological theories, provoking debate among AI enthusiasts and scientists.
Context of the Controversy
An individual challenged GPT-5's grasp of mutation theory, asserting that mutations may not be random, but rather directed by goals or processes unrelated to natural selection. GPT-5 defended the conventional view, maintaining that early mutations could provide unseen advantages. This sparked questions about the AI’s reasoning capability versus the scientific consensus.
Key Themes from User Reactions
Misunderstandings of Evolution: Commentators criticized the user's grasp of mutation theory, with one remarking, "Ask yourself what’s more likely: scientific consensus is clearly incorrect, or you don’t understand it properly?"
AI's Reasoning Capabilities: Discussions emerged around AI's capabilities, challenging its logic. One user noted, "It’s not reason, it’s training on many similar tests," highlighting the limits of algorithmic intelligence.
Defensive Responses: Some users supported AI's position, stating it reflects current scientific consensus effectively. A prominent comment emphasized, "ChatGPT understands evolution much better than you.