Edited By
Fatima Al-Sayed

A new animated film has sparked discussions over its creation process, highlighting a path that avoids artificial intelligence completely. The film's creator, Mateusz, shared that he personally handled about 70% of the animation while leveraging various software tools to bring his vision to life.
Mateusz utilized multiple programs including:
Blender for 3D modeling and editing scans.
Unreal Engine 5.4 for rendering and lighting.
Substance Painter for creating textures.
Marvelous Designer for clothing models.
Davinci Resolve for color grading and editing.
Facial animations were crafted using iPhone technology and required a significant amount of hand adjustments.
"I would have never finished this project without my friend David, who assisted with simulations in Houdini," Mateusz remarked. The cooperation extended into challenges faced, particularly with simulating some intricate clothing designs.
Mateusz initially attempted to use Marvelous Designer for clothing simulations but soon recognized its limitations. David's automated process, crafted in Houdini, ultimately resolved these issues, allowing for more precise simulation, particularly for the professor's outfit featuring a heavy steel chain.
The artistic environment has polarized opinions, as some people expressed skepticism toward animation created without AI. One comment noted, "Announcing that your project was made without it is slowly becoming the new seal of quality."
In contrast, others criticized this trend as unnecessary.
Skepticism of Authenticity: Many viewers doubt the authenticity of animated works, leading to a growing demand for transparency around the use of AI.
Pride in Craftsmanship: Others appreciated the effort, emphasizing the value of traditional skills and craftsmanship in digital art.
Calls for Clarity: Creators are increasingly pressed to provide disclaimers that highlight their commitment to non-AI approaches, fueling further debates.
โ 70% of the animation done by the creator without AI.
โถ๏ธ Collaboration with various artists enhanced the filmโs quality.
โ๏ธ An increase in skepticism towards animated works, with many craving transparency.
The demand for clarity in artistic processes seems to be a double-edged sword; while it may validate genuine craftsmanship, it contributes to an atmosphere of distrust. This animation project not only showcases the intricate work behind CGI but also engages with the ongoing conversation about technology's role in creativity.
Watch the full film and learn more about this innovative approach on YouTube.
Thereโs a strong chance that the trend of non-AI animation will continue to gain traction in the coming years. As skepticism towards automated processes grows, more creators may choose to emphasize their manual techniques to stand apart from AI-dominated works. Experts estimate around 60% of new animators will likely explore traditional methods, driven by audience demand for transparency in the creation process. This shift could foster a renaissance of craftsmanship in digital art, as artists collaborate to refine their skills. Moreover, it could lead to stronger community ties, where artisans share knowledge to enhance the artistry in this evolving landscape.
Consider the early days of photography in the 19th century; many artists initially viewed it as a threat to traditional painting. Just like today's animators resisting AI, photographers defended their craft by showcasing distinctive styles and techniques, emphasizing human creativity. This resistance ultimately led to a rich evolution in artistic expression, where different mediums coalesced. Todayโs CGI animators mirroring that sentiment illustrate how innovation challenges traditional practices while sparking new dialogues around authenticity and artistry.