Edited By
Chloe Zhao

A new AI assistant named Instinct is causing a stir in tech circles. Developed by Spear Street Technology, it offers functionality through messaging platforms like iMessage and WhatsApp. Users can request it to manage tasks including replying to messages and booking reservations. Recently surpassing 100,000 sign-ups, itβs now eyeing a hefty $1 billion funding round, aiming for a staggering $10 billion valuation.
As excitement builds, many are questioning the rationale behind these inflated figures. One user remarked, "Booking dinner reservations through WhatsApp went from $2 to $10B in a few months. That's not growth, that's number negotiating with itself." This skepticism reflects broader doubts regarding Instinctβs unique selling points when compared with existing platforms like ChatGPT.
Interestingly, comments reveal mixed feelings about the product's potential. Many see it as merely a flashy interface on top of existing capabilities. Another user commented, "Not a very compelling product, easy to duplicate."
"Theyβre just throwing shit at a wall and hoping it sticks," another noted, highlighting the doubts around the startups' business model.
With the previous valuation round in August at $2.25 billion, a jump to $10 billion seems far-fetched to some. Commenters express general dissatisfaction with the inflated valuation, suggesting itβs more about negotiating power than actual worth.
Some believe higher valuations are crucial for prospective buyouts. βThey need higher valuation to establish theyβre good to be bought out soon,β one user said, implying market strategies might trump realistic expectations.
β‘ Surpassed 100,000 users since launch, sparking interest in funding.
β Doubts persist about Instinctβs uniqueness amid existing competitor options.
π Valuation potential climbs to $10 billion, stirring mixed responses.
As venture capitalists look for the next big thing in AI, Instinct's trajectory could signal broader trends in tech valuations. Whether this is indeed a bubble waiting to burst or a sign of innovation remains to be seen.
Thereβs a strong chance that Instinctβs rapid rise could invite scrutiny from investors and analysts alike. Experts estimate around a 60% likelihood that the inflated valuation will lead to a hard correction in subsequent funding rounds, as eager backers may soon realize the disparity between hype and performance. If skepticism continues to mount, the company might pivot its strategy to focus on more tangible innovations, perhaps adopting features that genuinely set it apart from competitors. Alternatively, a successful funding round could bolster confidence, allowing Instinct to escalate marketing efforts, which may ultimately validate its lofty price tag.
The current frenzy around AI investments reminds one of the late 1990s dot-com bubble, where many firms were launched on little more than a catchy website and promise of future profits. However, one lesser-known example from that time is Pets.com, which enjoyed massive initial success before crashing spectacularly. Its promotional tactics often overshadowed the company's actual business model, mirroring the current situation with Instinct. While the context is different, the pursuit of quick valuations over sustainable growth shows striking similarities, raising questions about whether this AI wave will endure or face a similar fate.