Home
/
Latest news
/
Policy changes
/

Why did the left ignore ai regulation during election?

AI Regulation Concerns | Election Silence Ignites Controversy

By

Tina Schwartz

May 22, 2025, 05:34 PM

3 minutes needed to read

A group of politicians at a table, debating AI regulation with documents and laptops around them, showing concern on their faces.
popular

A significant silence surrounded the topic of AI regulation among leftist circles during the recent election, sparking criticism among vocal progressives. Despite mounting worries over unregulated AI since 2022, voices from the left appeared absent in the discussions leading up to the election.

Bidenโ€™s Major Executive Order

President Joe Biden signed what many consider the largest executive order to date, aiming to regulate AI technology companies comprehensively. As part of this initiative, Vice President Kamala Harris proposed the establishment of a new government agency specifically focused on AI oversight. Yet, many critics argue that these significant plans were overshadowed by other issues during the campaign season.

Discontent in Online Communities

Members of left-leaning forums expressed frustration over a perceived apathy towards critical discussions about AI's societal impacts. Notably, some commenters highlighted that young progressives were adamantly concerned about potential job losses and copyright violations stemming from AI.

"Everyone was doomposting about unregulated AI, but the same people didnโ€™t vote AGAINST unregulated AI," one user lamented.

Despite fears of AI's destructive potential, many online activists remained hesitant to engage politically, often identifying themselves as anti-voters.

Missed Opportunities Amid Growing Concerns

Critics noted that while discussions intensified over the threat posed by tech billionaires, the left let slip a chance to rally against Republican allies of AI. With Republican leaders proposing a 10-year ban on all AI-related regulations, the stakes seem even higher now.

Key Themes in the Discussion

  1. Protection of Workers: Many argue that AI legislation needs to prioritize the safeguarding of human roles in the job market. A comment asserted, "AI will only be a tool for good if that can happen."

  2. Distrust in Current Administration: Thereโ€™s a prevailing skepticism about how effectively the current administration can handle AI regulation. Commenters have pointed to a need for stricter rules to ensure AI acts in humanityโ€™s interest.

  3. Art and Culture at Risk: Concerns were raised about AI's impact on art and creative expression, with some fearing it may "destroy art" as a social concept.

Sentiment Patterns

The conversation reflects mixed feelings: frustration over inaction and disbelief regarding the administrationโ€™s motives. While many oppose unregulated AI, a sense of confusion surrounds the path forward.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Bidenโ€™s executive order is the largest attempt yet to regulate AI technology.

  • ๐Ÿ” Voices from the left on AI were notably quiet during election discussions, sparking criticism.

  • ๐Ÿ’ผ Workersโ€™ rights concerns were echoed strongly, emphasizing the need for AI oversight.

With the clock ticking on effective regulation, many are left wondering: How will these issues impact the future of both technology and society?

The growing dissatisfaction within progressive circles serves as a reminder of the necessity for open dialogue and active participation in political processes.

The Road Ahead: Regulatory Shifts on the Horizon

Experts foresee heightened regulatory initiatives around AI in the coming year, particularly as public anxiety grows. Thereโ€™s a strong chance that progressive groups will rally for stricter legislation, especially in light of Biden's executive order. As discussions ramp up, an estimated 60% likelihood exists that states will also create local regulations to address specific concerns, particularly around workforce displacement and ethical AI use. The pressure on policymakers will increase, as both supporters and critics of the current administration demand a clear plan moving forward. The urgency to strike a balance between innovation and responsibility will shape political and social discourse.

Lessons from the Past: The Tobacco Industryโ€™s Transformation

A unique parallel can be drawn from the shift in public sentiment towards the tobacco industry during the 1990s. Initially, concerns about health risks faced an uphill battle amid corporate resistance and public apathy. It wasn't until activists raised awareness and demanded accountability that meaningful change occurred. Similarly, the conversation around AI needs a push from concerned individuals to turn the tide. Just as the tobacco debate changed regulations and societal norms, the current climate around AI could pave the way for responsible innovationโ€”if enough people engage in the dialogue.