Home
/
Latest news
/
Policy changes
/

Lilo: the debate on accuracy in time tracking tools

LILO Tool Sparks Debate | Accuracy Stirs Mixed Reactions Among Federal Employees

By

Nina Patel

Oct 12, 2025, 12:16 AM

Edited By

Sarah O'Neil

Updated

Oct 12, 2025, 07:13 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A group of employees discussing a new time tracking tool, showcasing mixed emotions about its accuracy and effects on productivity.

A new time-tracking tool from the PTO, named LILO, is raising eyebrows among federal employees over accuracy concerns. While some praise LILO's precise tracking, others are finding it burdensome as they review their logged hours. Recently, some reported logging more than 24 hours in a day, sparking further debate.

Accuracy and Its Pitfalls

Employees are facing a new challenge as they adjust to LILO's rigorous reporting. One employee remarked, "It's more accurate than previous tools, but it’s still prone to error." Others echoed this sentiment, expressing frustration when LILO inaccurately reflected hours worked.

"For example, it says I didn’t log in at all last Friday," one employee complained.

Employee Responses to LILO

Mixed reactions reveal a fractured viewpoint among workers:

  • Positive Outlook: Some users note that the accuracy is beneficial, implying it protects against time mismanagement. "Better to keep your own independent records," suggested one worker who relies on personal tracking to supplement LILO’s reports.

  • Frustration with Errors: Others feel the tool falls short. One employee stated, "The total hours do that when I cross over midnight on consecutive days," highlighting issues with specific hour logging. This suggests LILO may not be universally reliable for everyone.

  • Concerns Over Increased Scrutiny: Pervasive tracking leads some to question the need for constant oversight. Another commentary stated, "Do we really need to know everything?" indicating a desire for an improved work-life balance amidst the constant monitoring.

As the workweek wraps up, employees review stark figures: a reported 135 hours logged over the last bi-week. Many are struggling with the realization their workload might be heavier than anticipated.

Key Takeaways

  • πŸ”Ή User Independent Tracking: Many employees are choosing to maintain their records alongside the automated logging by LILO.

  • πŸ”» Real-World Inaccuracy: Some workers experienced discrepancies where the tool failed to track their actual working hours.

  • 🌟 Common Sentiment of Overwhelmed Employees: "Now feels harder than ever," one employee noted, expressing the emotional strain of being constantly observed.

Looking Ahead

As the PTO implements the LILO tool, discussions about potential adjustments are heating up. Employees are eager to see if the tool evolves based on their feedback, aiming for a balance between accurate tracking and employee comfort.

What’s Next for Federal Employees?

The shift is ongoing. Predictions suggest a likelihood of enhancements, possibly around 70%, that may improve user experience. If negative reactions continue, however, the PTO could face backlash, which might affect employee morale. A careful approach to balancing transparency with employee privacy will be crucial in the coming months.

With LILO’s introduction still fresh, it remains to be seen how the landscape of federal time tracking will change, and whether employees will embrace or resist the tool's stringent oversight.