A growing number of people are voicing concerns about local upscaling tools, turning to user boards for advice. Tools like Fooocus and Upscayl are being criticized for detail loss, prompting users to question their real effectiveness.
As users turn to local upscalers to improve image quality, many report disappointing outcomes. A user shared, "I tried both Fooocus and Upscayl and both lost a lot of details. The quality just got worse." Another echoed this sentiment, noting that significant details became distorted.
Users are experimenting with various methods to achieve better results:
Mixed Techniques: One user suggested using traditional upscalers like Lanczos for dimension changes before applying a deblur lora to enhance clarity.
Img2img Approach: Another recommended a multi-step process increasing resolution in stages with lower denoise settings, creating room for the AI to add detail. "Try .3 as a good starting point," they advised, emphasizing the balance between too much change and too little.
Some users have discovered that alternatives like SUPIR and SeedVR2 outshine current tools in performance. They are urging others to refine their settings, particularly the denoising strength, to achieve better outcomes. "Careful configuration makes a big difference," noted one commenter.
"Your issue may happen if you use too high of a denoising strength," is a common piece of advice, underlining the need for careful adjustments.
Overall, the mood among users remains largely negative, with many sharing tales of frustration. "There are tons of upscalers these days," one remarked, highlighting the plethora of options yet the difficulty in finding quality results.
๐ป Many report a quality decline in images after using local upscalers.
โ๏ธ Effectiveness hinges heavily on settings, especially denoising strength.
๐ Techniques involving traditional upscalers and img2img show promise for better outcomes.
As these discussions unfold, itโs clear the push for improvements in local upscaling tools continues, while developers respond to user feedback. The challenges posed by local upscalers keep many questioning which techniques and settings are best suited to resolving the issues at hand. Amidst this backdrop, one question lingers: will tool developers act swiftly to meet user needs, or will frustration reach a boiling point?
Developers may soon lean into user feedback for algorithm refinements, especially since dissatisfaction levels are rising. Expect a surge in performance-based metrics choices as users streamline expectations for faster and more precise image enhancement.
This ongoing discourse emphasizes that as technology evolves, users must adapt their approaches, honing skills that could lead to significant improvements in image quality.