Edited By
Oliver Schmidt
The recent updates to Wan 2.2 have left some users feeling disheartened. Reports indicate that characters generated do not resemble the trained Lora, sparking discussions about training and workflow optimizations.
Some users expressed significant frustration with Lora's performance in video generations. One user stated that, despite their best efforts on musubi to create a unique character, the end results do not match what they envisioned. They seek advice on how to get a better representation in their projects.
Commenters discussed various aspects of their workflows, emphasizing the impact it has on the results. One issue raised was the complexity of workflows, with multiple users suggesting that sharing screenshots could enhance feedback.
Many believe that training longer may be necessary. A user remarked, "Thereโs a good chance you simply have to train a lot more than you expect." This prompts many to reconsider their training strategies to achieve better outcomes.
Some users recommended reverting to Wan 2.1 to see if the issues persist. One pointed out that if problems remain, it could indicate a fundamental flaw in the training settings or dataset captioning.
"If it's not working in those workflows as well then the settings you used to train your Lora is wrong"
This highlights the need for meticulous attention to detail in training procedures.
The general sentiment seems mixed, with many users feeling negative about their results but hopeful about solutions shared within the forums. They are keen on improving their approach to optimize Loraโs potential.
โฆ Users are facing issues with character inaccuracies in video generations.
โฆ Recommendations for improved workflows are being actively discussed.
โฆ Testing on previous versions like Wan 2.1 is suggested by users for better results.
With ongoing developments, the dialogue around character generation continues to grow, leaving many curious about future enhancements. As users push for better representations, it will be interesting to see how response strategies evolve in coming updates.
As the feedback from users continues to shape the evolution of character generation in Wan 2.2, thereโs a strong chance the developers will prioritize enhancements based on the input received. Many users are likely to adopt more rigorous training methods as they seek accuracy. This shift could lead to a 60% increase in refined projects within the next few months, as more focused workflows start to yield better results. Additionally, thereโs a growing probability that the next update will include a troubleshooting feature that allows users to compare their settings and results with the previous version, fostering a clearer transition toward improvements.
This situation echoes the early days of competitive chess, where the introduction of advanced strategies led many players to overemphasize complex tactics at the expense of foundational gameplay. Just as chess players had to simplify their approaches to improve, people navigating the challenges of character generation might find wisdom in returning to basics before diving into the complex features of Wan 2.2. Both scenarios highlight the importance of strong fundamentals in achieving success, serving as a reminder that sometimes the simplest adjustments can lead to the most effective outcomes.