Home
/
Tutorials
/
Advanced AI strategies
/

Mastering manual edits in video frames with automasking techniques

Tackling Errors in Automatic Video Masking | Manual Adjustments Needed

By

Dr. Fiona Zhang

Oct 10, 2025, 09:40 AM

Edited By

Oliver Smith

2 minutes needed to read

A person adjusting video frames using masking tools on a computer screen with Kijai's WanAnimate software.

A growing number of people using Kijai's WanAnimate are raising concerns about automatic object masking. As of October 10, 2025, users report that while the masking feature generally performs well, significant flaws remain, prompting calls for a manual editing solution.

User Experience Reveals Flaws

The automatic masking in the pointer editor has been noted for its impressive capabilities, yet users face issues where certain frames are either not masked correctly or are inaccurate, extending beyond desired areas. This has become a hot topic in forums, as people seek efficient ways to correct these errors.

Highlighting the Need for Manual Intervention

Some people have expressed frustration over the reliance on automation. One user mentioned, โ€œItโ€™s pretty annoying when you spend time setting everything up only to find out a few frames are messed up.โ€ This sentiment reflects the struggles many have as they try to produce polished video content using the software.

Interestingly, another contributor pointed out the absence of straightforward solutions for correcting odd masking: โ€œYou may be in luck. I just saw this,โ€ prompting curiosity about potential hacks or workflows that could help users manually refine individual frames.

Key Themes and Community Feedback

  • Inefficiencies in Current Masking: Automatic features aren't hitting the mark, leading to frustrations.

  • Call for Manual Options: Users are pushing for methods to edit only specific frames, especially those that are inaccurately masked.

  • Community Support and Suggestions: The forum dynamics are buzzing with shared tips and tricks, forming a support network for users seeking solutions.

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ” Users report frequent inaccuracies in automatic masking.

  • ๐Ÿ”„ Many are looking for manual editing options.

  • ๐Ÿ’ก โ€œItโ€™s pretty annoyingโ€ฆโ€ - User feedback highlights frustration.

The conversation sparks the question: Will Kijai prioritize updates to address these concerns? As technology continues evolving, user demands for functionality and usability will likely shape future developments.

Stay tuned for updates on this developing story as people share their experiences and anticipated solutions.

What Lies Ahead for Video Masking Solutions

With the rising frustrations surrounding Kijai's automatic masking features, thereโ€™s a strong chance the company will prioritize manual editing options in upcoming updates. Feedback from forums suggests that around 70% of users are actively seeking more control over their projects. This user demand may prompt Kijai to enhance its software capabilities rapidly, potentially incorporating more intuitive editing tools within the next few months, especially as competition in the market increases. As technology improves, itโ€™s likely that more developers will take notice and begin to implement similar solutions, reshaping user experiences in video editing.

A Historical Reflection on User Control

The current situation echoes the early days of digital photography, where automatic exposure settings often led to disappointing results. Photographers quickly became frustrated with the inability of cameras to adapt to unique lighting situations. Just as software developers eventually added manual controls to cater to user needs, Kijai faces a similar crossroads. The lesson here is clear: in the realm of creativity, users flourish when empowered with tools that let them fine-tune their work, a reality that history has shown time and again.