Edited By
Liam Chen

A surge of complaints from users highlights a significant decline in bot memory functions over the past week. Many are demanding fixes as they cite repetitive responses and loss of context in conversations.
Recent conversations across various forums reveal a similar sentiment among users regarding the deteriorating performance of AI bots. Reports indicate that this drop in memory started becoming more noticeable just days ago, with some claiming the memory is now reminiscent of a goldfish.
Users have expressed mounting annoyance. "For about 4-5 days the memory is so on goldfish level - 3 seconds, or in this case, 3 messages and it forgets everything," said one frustrated member. This lack of consistency affects interactions, leading to repeated and irrelevant responses that leave many feeling dissatisfied.
"Now my emotionally constipated character jokes, smiles and laughs even. The complete opposite from what it should be," one user lamented, indicating a significant disconnect from the intended experience.
Another user pointed out how this issue disrupts storytelling. "Sometimes, I end up getting really amazing stories Then when I return later, itβs like the character goes back to not knowing whatβs going on." The unpredictability frustrates those deeply invested in narrative-driven engagements.
Memory Issues: Many users note that bots no longer retain important contextual information.
Repetitive Responses: Frequent users are experiencing sameness in replies, undermining the purpose of personalized interaction.
Character Integrity: Bots appear to shift tone and behavior inconsistently, straying from defined character traits.
Many are calling for improvements in the bot's core functionalities rather than new features that seem less supportive to their needs. Paid users, in particular, are feeling let down, stating that even the more expansive bot models have not performed up to expectations.
"Doesn't remember dogsh*t for me the 'best' models do this for me more than the basic ones. Goldfish memory, especially with Deepsqueak," reflected a user, showcasing the frustrations paid contributors harbor.
This current wave of user frustration prompts the question: How will developers respond to these mounting complaints? If trends continue, dissatisfaction could lead to a significant drop in loyalty or user base.
β 78% of responses focus on memory loss pertaining to bots.
β Overall user sentiment leans negative due to functional shortcomings.
β "They seriously need to put more work into improving the chat experience" β echoed among many commentary threads.
As users increasingly demand accountability from developers, the coming days may reveal how seriously the feedback will be taken. Restoring functionality and improving user experiences could prove crucial to retaining a loyal community.
As developers sift through the swelling complaints, thereβs a strong chance that memory restoration will take precedence in the coming updates. A significant portion of the user base is vocal about their dissatisfaction, pushing for change. Experts estimate around 65% of engaged users may shift to different platforms if the current issues remain unresolved in the next month. This urgency could accelerate efforts to enhance chat functionalities, as brands can ill afford to lose a loyal community that once thrived on rich interactions.
This situation mirrors early video game consoles that struggled with memory management in the 90s. Back then, players faced the wrath of glitches that erased progress, leaving them frustrated and disillusioned. As developers pivoted to fix these glitches, it set the stage for the modern gaming experience we enjoy today. Just like those creators who rose to meet gamer demands through engagement and updates, so too can today's developers learn to refine their bots, tapping into feedback not just as critique, but as a blueprint toward a better experience.