Edited By
Lisa Fernandez

Microsoft is reportedly planning significant layoffs as early as January 2026, affecting between 11,000 and 22,000 roles. This could account for 5% to 10% of its 220,000-strong workforce. Users express frustration with the companyβs AI tools, positioning the layoffs as a means to offset mounting expenses tied to AI development.
Leading the charge of discontent, many employees cite dissatisfaction with Microsoftβs AI offerings, particularly Copilot, considered inferior to competitors. "Crazy that they continually double down on whatβs easily the worst AI out there," one commented, reflecting a widespread sentiment that the push for Copilot is forced upon reluctant employees.
The looming layoffs appear to stem from a strategy to manage rising costs linked to AI projects. Critics argue that instead of focusing on improving products, Microsoft is opting for drastic workforce reductions. "What a stupid company. Layoff your talent to go all in on speculative technology,β said another commentator, underscoring concerns about the company's direction.
Interestingly, some foresee a potential positive impact on stock prices as shareholders might favor reduced payroll expenses. "Stock price will jump as shareholders cheer this move," one user speculated, indicating a troubling reality where job cuts are viewed as beneficial for investors.
"AI costs doing a lot of work here when the company is still massively profitable." - Commenter
Dissatisfaction with AI Tools: There's a strong consensus that Microsoftβs AI, particularly Copilot, does not meet expectations. Many employees are actively seeking alternatives, with some quitting subscriptions.
Criticism of Business Strategy: Commentators are vocal about Microsoftβs choices, condemning the layoffs as misguided and questioning the rationale behind prioritizing AI over human talent.
Financial Speculation: Discussions imply that layoffs could artificially inflate stock value, a concern that suggests a misalignment between corporate practices and employee welfare.
π¨ Between 11,000 and 22,000 layoffs expected, possibly 5-10% of workforce.
π Employees express frustration with Copilot, labeling it the worst among AI tools.
π Speculation suggests stock prices could rise post-layoffs, benefitting shareholders amid job losses.
As Microsoft navigates these challenges, the company's commitment to AI faces scrutiny, questioning if drastic cost-cutting measures will truly foster innovation or simply sacrifice human resources for short-term gains.
As Microsoft braces for potential layoffs, experts see a strong chance that stock prices could rise amidst turmoil, possibly by 5% to 15% in the near term, as investors react to decreased payroll costs. The company may adjust its strategy by reallocating resources to enhance AI tools or exploring partnerships to bolster Copilotβs competitive edge. Staying competitive will depend on whether Microsoft can effectively navigate employee dissatisfaction while still appealing to its shareholders. If costs continue to outweigh gains, we might see even more drastic cuts down the line affecting product development and innovation.
Consider the dot-com bubble of the early 2000s when many tech firms, convinced that cutting human resources would maximize profits, opted for mass layoffs. Companies like Cisco and Oracle faced backlash from employees, but some, like Amazon, used their downturn as a learning opportunity, retooling their services and workforce. The lesson here is that while Microsoft may cut talent to trim expenses, thereβs a real risk that it could limit potential opportunities for growth and creativity, just as those past companies learned the hard way.