New Qwen Edit Workflow | Users Share Mixed Results in Image Editing
A surge of feedback from people surrounding a recent Qwen image editing workflow reveals a mix of enthusiasm and frustration. While some praise the new mask feature, others claim it produces unsatisfactory results and have raised concerns over its functionality.
Context of the New Workflow
This innovative workflow allows users to edit only masked areas of images when toggled on, reflecting a community-driven push for more precise editing tools. Users are actively discussing various aspects of the technology on forums, showcasing both excitement and concern.
Key Themes from User Feedback
Output Quality Issues: Several commenters reported disappointing results, stating that the difference in output preservation was negligible. One user said, "It gives zero difference in the output preservation for me. The output faces are still different from the original."
Operational Confusion: Users noted that the feature does not work effectively when the mask is off. One said, "It changed the whole image when not masked. I don’t know what is wrong on my end."
Integration with Other Tools: Some individuals reported successful usage with additional software, such as confirming that this workflow works well in conjunction with the inpaint crop and stitch node if set up correctly. A user mentioned, "It works so well that I’m wondering if this makes the inpainting controlnet from another service redundant."
"This works really well, thanks for the workflow."
Community Assessment
The sentiment varies among people, ranging from excitement about potential to dissatisfaction with current limitations. A notable observation comes from a user who confirmed success by stating that adjustments must be made to the functionality of the mask:
"Make sure noise_mask is set to true."
Key Takeaways
⭐ Output quality remains a sticking point for many users.
🔄 Users identify potential operational improvements needed for better usability.
🔗 Some successful integrations with other software reported.
Looking into the Future
As feedback continues to pour in, it’s clear that the community's voice will shape future developments. Will user insights lead to a more refined editing experience? Only time will tell. The ongoing discourse among people echoes how collective knowledge can lead to significant advancements, highlighting the need for continuous improvement in digital design tools.