A growing coalition of people is weighing in on a recent workflow for image processing with Qwen, seeing it as a game changer. The discussion is fueled by users testing its capabilities for image generation and its effectiveness in crafting realistic visuals.
The current Qwen image processing model allows for linking image processes to a dataset, focusing mainly on creating images based on provided prompts. Recent comments highlight additional challenges such as missing essential tools. One user expressed frustration: "It says I'm missing the CR Prompt list and CR Image Grid Panel. I can't seem to figure it out."
Participants shared varied takes:
Some praised the enhancements, especially regarding skin details. One noted, "He has it run through an sdxl checkpoint for refining at very low denoise."
However, caution was raised by others who indicated unrealistic output in close-ups, with one person saying, "Just don't zoom in on any of the resulting images unless you like plastic/wax statues."
A significant concern revolves around the trade-off between creativity and the modelโs tendency to create artificial results. People worry about consistent facial expression generation, with calls for features addressing this issue.
Despite some reservations, the workflow receives mainly positive feedback. Users show excitement, declaring:
"This looks interesting. I will try this out soon."
Many agree that it offers a substantial option for fast content creation, making complex processes easier.
The workflow introduces intriguing possibilities but faces critiques about maintaining realism. One user remarked, "You're right that there would be a tension between the diversity of new poses/clothing and the rest of what QI brings along with it." The consensus indicates that while potential is high, achieving satisfactory realism remains a challenge.
โจ Many commend the skin detail enhancement capabilities.
โ ๏ธ Some caution against unrealistic appearances in close-up images.
๐ค Multiple users seek features for consistent facial expression across generated images.
๐ Some express difficulty in accessing necessary tools, impacting workflow understanding.
Looking forward, as 2025 advances, the fusion of AI and image processing will likely draw more attention. Observations indicate that as feedback accumulates, improvements may focus on enhancing realism in image editing tools, echoing historical struggles within the creative community. What other innovations might emerge in this fast-evolving field?