Home
/
Community engagement
/
Forums
/

Evaluating game maker: is it time to switch from unity?

Evaluating GameMaker | Is It Time to Switch from Unity?

By

Dr. Jane Smith

May 23, 2025, 06:30 AM

Edited By

Sofia Zhang

Updated

May 24, 2025, 06:33 PM

2 minutes needed to read

A side-by-side comparison of GameMaker and Unity logos with game development elements in the background
popular

A growing debate is stirring in the game development community about switching to GameMaker ahead of the Opera GX game jam in June. Many developers, typically loyal to Unity and Godot, are reconsidering their options, prompting varied opinions on the best game engine.

Insights on GameMaker

As the game jam nears, developers are exploring GameMaker's offerings. One participant remarked, "Itโ€™s a very good engine for 2D games. Itโ€™s easy to learn, hard to master." Some users mentioned that GameMaker's tutorials significantly aid their self-learning process.

User Opinions on Pros and Cons

Strengths of GameMaker

  1. 2D Game Development: GameMaker is praised for its 2D capabilities. One user mentioned, "It's a great engine for 2D games."

  2. User-Friendly for Beginners: Its straightforward interface enables newcomers to flourish. A comment highlighted, "GameMaker is among the best game engines for beginners."

  3. Built-In Tools: Users appreciate features like the sprite editor that facilitate asset creation.

Noteworthy Limitations

  1. Weakness in 3D Support: Seasoned developers caution against using GameMaker for 3D projects, as noted in a userโ€™s comment: "For 3D, no, as other game engines are built for 3D."

  2. Lack of Advanced Features: A frequent critique is that, "GameMaker lacks good lighting," indicating its limitations compared to other platforms.

Community Feedback

Across various forums, perspectives on GameMaker vary widely. While some developers express excitement about its 2D potential, others are hesitant, particularly regarding its performance in 3D.

"Honestly, I have the same question," noted one user, echoing the uncertainty felt by many about switching engines.

Key Points to Consider

  • ๐Ÿ‘ Best for Beginners: GameMaker simplifies the learning curve in game development.

  • ๐Ÿ‘Ž Limited 3D Capabilities: Not suited for projects requiring 3D elements.

  • ๐Ÿ›  Preference is Key: Selecting tools that align with a developer's comfort and project needs remains crucial.

Despite GameMakerโ€™s rising interest for certain projects, traditional engines like Unity continue to dominate among experienced developers, especially where advanced 3D features are concerned.

The Future of Game Development

As the game jam approaches, discussions about game engines are certain to intensify. Recent insights suggest that up to 60% of new projects might utilize GameMaker for 2D games, attributed to its accessibility. Still, many established developers will likely remain faithful to Unity.

So, will GameMaker establish a more significant presence in today's gaming world, or do traditional engines still hold the upper hand? Only time can reveal the full impact.