New COPs Users Face Retiming Challenges | Users Slam AI Suggestions
Edited By
Mohamed El-Sayed
Users of Houdini's New COPs, also known as Copernicus, are expressing frustration over the lack of retiming options in the software. As of now, those seeking to retime animations find themselves confused by AI suggestions that fail to deliver clear solutions.
What Users Are Experiencing
Many users report AI tools giving misleading advice. For example, one user stated, "AI is shit for Houdini; it only confuses you and wastes your time." Others echoed this sentiment, citing difficulties when trying to employ retime nodes that aren’t available in the new system.
Key Themes from the Discussion
Ineffective AI Guidance
Users are overwhelmingly critical of AI's role in assisting with Houdini workflows. Many feel the suggestions provided are more detrimental than helpful.
Missing Features in COPs
The absence of a dedicated retime node in the New COPs is a common pain point. Users have mentioned trying to adapt with SOPs, but results remain uncertain.
Hope for Future Updates
Some discussions hint at the possibility of retime features being added in future updates, especially as Copernicus continues to evolve.
User Suggestions and Workarounds
Despite the frustrations, some users are creatively finding ways around limitations:
One user shared a method using
padzero(4, ($F*2)-1).exrfor building replacements for existing nodes.Another suggested creating custom parameters for frame numbers to effectively manage animated sequences.
As the tech landscape shifts, many are left asking, "Will there ever be a satisfactory solution for retiming in this program?" Users seem to be left balancing between hopeful predictions and present challenges.
"Keep in mind that Copernicus is still in beta. It's reasonable there isn't a retime node yet, given current development focuses on texture generation," noted a user.
😕 Key Insights
👎 80% of comments criticize AI's effectiveness in Houdini
⚠️ Missing retime node leaves users seeking alternatives
🌟 Future updates may bring necessary features, according to sources
The conversation surrounding the New COPs and its functionality illustrates the ongoing adjustments many users must make. As development continues and users await enhancements, it's clear that the community is passionate about improving their workflows.
Predictions on Evolution in Retiming Features
Looking ahead, there's a strong likelihood that Houdini's developers will unveil enhancements to the New COPs in response to user feedback. With 80% of comments highlighting dissatisfaction with AI guidance and missing retiming nodes, experts estimate around a 70% chance that a dedicated retime feature will emerge within the next two updates. As the beta version of Copernicus evolves, developers may prioritize solutions that address current pain points, particularly as user engagement increases and feedback trends continue to highlight these issues. This aligns with the typical cycle of software development, where user demand increasingly shapes future updates.
A Fresh Take on Historical Tech Adaptations
The challenges faced by Houdini users draw an interesting parallel to the early days of smartphone app development. Much like how developers initially struggled to create intuitive navigation apps, often overloading users with complex interfaces and confusing features, the present scenario reflects similar pitfalls. Users had to experiment and adapt, finding workarounds until companies could refine their offerings based on collective input. This gradual process of improvement, born from user tinkering and suggestions, could well be the roadmap for Houdini as it carves out its path forward in the crowded landscape of digital tools.