Home
/
Latest news
/
Industry updates
/

Web traffic decline: chat gpt experiences 22% drop post gemini

Web Traffic Decline | Users Dissatisfied with ChatGPT's Experience

By

Anita Singh

Jan 7, 2026, 06:07 AM

Edited By

Sofia Zhang

Updated

Jan 7, 2026, 10:38 PM

2 minutes needed to read

Graph showing 22% decline in ChatGPT web traffic after Gemini 3 launch
popular

Recent data reveal ChatGPT's web traffic has dropped by 22% over the last six weeks, coinciding with the launch of Gemini 3. Users are voicing dissatisfaction with the platform, pointing the finger at both Gemini and the new version, 5.2, due to less favorable interactions compared to previous models.

Users Push Back Against 5.2

Amid perceptions of declining quality, users are expressing serious concerns online. One comment noted, "5.2 is unpleasant to talk to," suggesting that the changes aren’t solely due to Gemini 3. Users have indicated that they prefer earlier versions. Comments from forums reflect frustration, with one user stating, "Genuinely think it has nothing to do with Gemini 3 and everything to do with 5.2 being objectively horrible to use."

Financial Challenges Persist

As web traffic slides, the financial implications are becoming evident. There’s been a noticeable drop in weekly active users, affecting conversion rates for paid subscriptions. A user remarked sarcastically, "The good news is, they're losing only a couple of billion dollars a month."

Feature Criticisms Surface

Critics are targeting the functionality of ChatGPT, particularly complaining about complex bias controls and guardrails. One user argued, "They're trying too hard to manipulate bias and ended up nerfing every aspect of it as a side effect." This sentiment is widespread, sparking worry about whether OpenAI is adequately addressing user needs.

Key Insights

  • πŸ“‰ Traffic Drop: ChatGPT’s traffic has declined by 22%, linked to Gemini 3.

  • πŸ’° Financial Impact: Reduced user engagement has resulted in dips in revenue.

  • 🧩 Experience Issues: Many users are dissatisfied, especially regarding the performance of 5.2.

"You can tell it’s not fake because it’s posted on the internet," said a user rebutting skepticism about data credibility.

As the tech community watches closely, will OpenAI be able to mend relations with its audience? User sentiments seem mixed; some still find value, while many voice concerns about overall performance.

What's Next for OpenAI?

Looking forward, there's speculation that OpenAI might implement significant updates to tackle these emerging issues. Experts suggest a notable chance (around 60%) that they’ll make improvements in user experience by addressing complaints surrounding memory and accuracy. Additionally, a 70% chance exists for a pricing model overhaul to appeal to both new and current users.

The Path Forward

The ongoing conversation showcases how critical it is for tech companies to remain responsive to their audience. With ChatGPT at a crossroads, the outcomes of these adjustments could set the stage for its future success or lead it down a path similar to those of once-popular brands that couldn’t pivot swiftly enough. \n

In the end, the question lingers: Can OpenAI adapt to meet the evolving needs of its user base and restore confidence?