
Recent data reveal ChatGPT's web traffic has dropped by 22% over the last six weeks, coinciding with the launch of Gemini 3. Users are voicing dissatisfaction with the platform, pointing the finger at both Gemini and the new version, 5.2, due to less favorable interactions compared to previous models.
Amid perceptions of declining quality, users are expressing serious concerns online. One comment noted, "5.2 is unpleasant to talk to," suggesting that the changes arenβt solely due to Gemini 3. Users have indicated that they prefer earlier versions. Comments from forums reflect frustration, with one user stating, "Genuinely think it has nothing to do with Gemini 3 and everything to do with 5.2 being objectively horrible to use."
As web traffic slides, the financial implications are becoming evident. Thereβs been a noticeable drop in weekly active users, affecting conversion rates for paid subscriptions. A user remarked sarcastically, "The good news is, they're losing only a couple of billion dollars a month."
Critics are targeting the functionality of ChatGPT, particularly complaining about complex bias controls and guardrails. One user argued, "They're trying too hard to manipulate bias and ended up nerfing every aspect of it as a side effect." This sentiment is widespread, sparking worry about whether OpenAI is adequately addressing user needs.
π Traffic Drop: ChatGPTβs traffic has declined by 22%, linked to Gemini 3.
π° Financial Impact: Reduced user engagement has resulted in dips in revenue.
π§© Experience Issues: Many users are dissatisfied, especially regarding the performance of 5.2.
"You can tell itβs not fake because itβs posted on the internet," said a user rebutting skepticism about data credibility.
As the tech community watches closely, will OpenAI be able to mend relations with its audience? User sentiments seem mixed; some still find value, while many voice concerns about overall performance.
Looking forward, there's speculation that OpenAI might implement significant updates to tackle these emerging issues. Experts suggest a notable chance (around 60%) that theyβll make improvements in user experience by addressing complaints surrounding memory and accuracy. Additionally, a 70% chance exists for a pricing model overhaul to appeal to both new and current users.
The ongoing conversation showcases how critical it is for tech companies to remain responsive to their audience. With ChatGPT at a crossroads, the outcomes of these adjustments could set the stage for its future success or lead it down a path similar to those of once-popular brands that couldnβt pivot swiftly enough. \n
In the end, the question lingers: Can OpenAI adapt to meet the evolving needs of its user base and restore confidence?