Edited By
Marcelo Rodriguez

A recent YouTube review labeled the indie game Hong Kong 2097 as "garbage," igniting a debate in the gaming community. Developer expresses concern as a prominent content creator shares a negative review, claiming controller issues impacted gameplay.
Released on Itch.io after being rejected by Steam and other platforms, Hong Kong 2097 draws inspiration from the controversial game Hong Kong 97. The developer sent out review copies to content creators, hoping to gain traction. However, the response from Video Gaming Esoterica raised eyebrows.
The YouTuber's review, titled Donโt bother playing it. Hong Kong 2097 is garbage, pointed out compatibility issues with his controller. "The right stick didnโt respond at all,โ he claimed, making the twin-stick shooter unplayable. The developer noted that others experienced no such issues.
"No one else reported trouble with controller compatibility," the developer stated, highlighting the unusual nature of the review.
Commenters have suggested various ways to handle the situation:
Ignore the review: "All reviews are subjective," one commenter noted, emphasizing the inevitability of criticism in game development.
Address the concerns: Some believe it's vital to examine the controller issue further, advocating for a response to improve customer experience.
Context matters: Given the game's design as a sequel to a controversial title, many suggest that criticism was expected.
"Getting into arguments with critics won't help you," one seasoned developer advised, reflecting a common sentiment in the industry.
Another stated, "You don't want to start feuds with YouTubersโthey rarely end well."
A remark pointed out that, "Even if the game is challenging, if your control methods are clunky, maybe fix those before launching."
โ ๏ธ Feedback is crucial: "Consider the feedback, if there is anything to learn from it," suggests one commenter, underlining the importance of constructive criticism.
๐ก Engagement can lead to improvement: Addressing valid concerns could enhance gameplay and user satisfaction.
๐ค Expect backlash: Anticipate mixed reactions, especially for controversial content, as many acknowledged the inherent risks of offensive themes in games.
As discussions continue online, the outcome for Hong Kong 2097 remains uncertain. Will it recover from this blow, or is this critique just another hurdle in the journey of indie game development? The community is watching closely, ready to see how this unfolds.
Thereโs a significant chance that the developer behind Hong Kong 2097 will double down on community engagement to address the review's concerns. Experts estimate around a 70% probability that a patch will be issued to address potential controller compatibility issues, as proactive measures can help rebuild player trust. Additionally, social media engagement might increase, showcasing real-time feedback and improvements. Given the game's controversial nature, this incident could actually serve as a case study for how indie games navigate criticismโleading to more refined, player-focused development.
In the late 1990s, when companies like Sony launched the PlayStation, they faced backlash over poor game launches tied to technical flaws. Instead of retreating, they established more robust developer-support systems and created a feedback loop that defined a generation of gaming. Just like those companies turned early criticism into a blueprint for success, Hong Kong 2097 can take this moment as a catalyst for improving gameplay mechanics, ultimately reshaping its narrative and creating a stronger connection with its audience.